The situation

Every one of 1,400 SKUs competing for the same flat budget.

Harrow & Finch's Google Shopping feed treated every product in the catalog equally, from top sellers to items that hadn't moved in months. Product titles were inconsistent, categories overlapped, and creative for Meta was a handful of static product-on-white images with no lifestyle context.

Spend was getting spread thin across the whole catalog instead of concentrated where demand actually was.

Snapshot

Home Goods Industry
9 months Engagement length
Google Shopping, Meta Channels
The approach

Let the catalog's winners pull their weight.

A cleaner feed structure and sharper creative did more than any bid adjustment could.

Rebuilt the feed structure

Products were regrouped into performance-based tiers, with bestsellers isolated into their own campaigns and given priority budget.

Rebuilt creative around bestsellers

New lifestyle photography and short video for the top-performing 15% of the catalog replaced generic product-on-white imagery.

Tightened match types

Search match types were narrowed to cut spend on browsing-intent queries that rarely converted into an actual sale.

The results

A feed that spends where the demand already is.

Concentrating budget on what actually sells changed the account's economics within a single quarter.

+89%
Return on ad spend
-24%
Cost per acquisition
+33%
Click-through rate on Shopping ads
15%
Of catalog now driving most of the revenue
★★★★★

"We were spreading budget across our entire catalog like every product deserved the same shot. Once they rebuilt the feed around what was actually selling, the account finally started acting like it made sense."

Nadia Ferris
E-commerce Manager, Harrow & Finch Home
Want results like this

Bring us your numbers, and we'll tell you what we'd change.

A 30-minute audit, no pitch attached.